May 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS

	COLUMNS
	EDITOR’S LETTER
	LESSONS OF ’68

	FILM
	Amy Taubin on James Nares

	MAY ’68
	Arthur C. Danto on the student revolt at Columbia University

	Ti-Grace Atkinson on art and logic

	Chris Kraus on *Suck*

	Michelle Kuo speaks with Michael Callahan about USCO

	TOP TEN
	Qiu Zhijie

	PREVIEWS
	SUMMER EXHIBITIONS
	50 shows worldwide

	US NEWS
	Michael Wilson on the 55th Carnegie International

	Brian Sholis on the Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis

	VAULT
	Michael Cole on Gian Lorenzo Bernini

	Michael Penn on the Dead Sea Scrolls

	ON THE ROAD
	Traveling Exhibitions

	FEATURES
	MAY '68

	THE GREAT REFUSAL Sylvère Lotringer

	A REVOLUTIONARY PROCESS NEVER ENDS Sylvère Lotringer and Antonio Negri

	THE GROUP THAT WAS (NOT) ONE: DANIEL BUREN AND BMPT Benjamin H. D. Buchloh

	INVISIBLE CITIES: HENRI LEFEBVRE’S THE EXPLOSION Tom McDonough

	THE DIFFERENCE ENGINE Liam Gillick

	NO WAVE: THE ZANZIBAR GROUP Sally Shafto

	LEARNING CURVE: RADICAL ART AND EDUCATION IN GERMANY Tom Holert

	ON THE BREACH Gerald Raunig

	INNER STATES: GUSTAVE COURBET Paul Galvez

	WHAT IS GUSTAVE COURBET? A Portfolio by Michael Krebber

	1000 WORDS: ED RUSCHA Barry Schwabsky

	IMMANENT DOMAIN: THE FILMS OF PETER HUTTON P. Adams Sitney

	REVIEWS
	Bob Nickas on Philip Taaffe

	Martin Herbert on Paul McCarthy

	Suzanne Hudson on Martin Puryear

	Jordan Kantor on Enrique Chagoya


	From New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Toronto, London, Coventry, Paris, Antwerp, Berlin, Cologne, Hamburg, Basel, Milan, Rovereto, Verona, Stockholm, Lisbon, Murcia, Tokyo, Osaka, Seoul, and Mumbai Click here for more details


	Invisible Cities: Henri Lefebvre's The Explosion
	“Henri Lefebvre’s thought captures that blend of theory and poetry, Marxism and surrealism, characteristic of the student movement of ’68,” notes architecture and urbanism theorist Tom McDonough in his discussion of Lefebvre’s recently republished book The Explosion. “However, if we turn back to Lefebvre now, it is not simply out of nostalgia but because his analysis—based finally on a desire to ground political debate at the level of the immediately lived—bears directly on our own circumstances.”

May 2008TABLE OF CONTENTS