Alerts & Newsletters

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services.

MATTHEW RITCHIE

It took me until ’93 to really realize just how thoroughly American artists of the ’80s had disconnected themselves from the entire structure and burden of art history. They embraced and as quickly rejected anything that took their fancy, from French philosophy to hedonistic capitalism and pseudo-revolution. But the ambition and greed of this scorched-earth approach ended up being totally liberating. When the smoke cleared, anything was possible, and with that freedom came the redefinitions of context, responsibility, and practice that defines much of ’90s art: the kind of nominally coherent but totally individualized internal narratives and ecologies that link practices as diverse as those of Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Matthew Barney, Robert Gober, Cindy Sherman, David Hammons, and Rirkrit Tiravanija.

As told to Tim Griffin

Martin Kippenberger’s Sympathische Kommunistin (Pleasant communist girl) (detail), 1983, as reflected in a mirror at the Chelsea Hotel, Cologne, ca. 1989.
Martin Kippenberger’s Sympathische Kommunistin (Pleasant communist girl) (detail), 1983, as reflected in a mirror at the Chelsea Hotel, Cologne, ca. 1989.
Photo: Louise Lawler.
APRIL 2003
VOL. 41, NO. 8
PMC Logo
Artforum is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2023 PMC PEP, LLC. All Rights Reserved. PEP is a trademark of Penske Media Corporation.