TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTERS

LETTERS

Sirs:

All the while we have been viewing him as the most hardboiled ideologue, the affronted Mr. Greenberg has been considering himself the willing victim of the most unpredictable and involuntary esthetic reactions. It is quite a surprise, especially in the light of the fact that, no matter how liberal he claims to be in private, he has for years chosen to write only about one tendency in art. That he sees this tendency as the most significant is his privilege, but to elevate it as the modernism stemming from, and validated by the tradition of modern art is not only to confuse part with whole, or to revise a complex, highly differentiated history, but to erect a superstructure hemming in that very “quality” he generously judges to be so diffused in the experience of contemporary art.

Besides, if “quality” equals content, and content is undiscussable, it is also an absolute, an “effect”

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.