TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTERS

LETTERS

Sirs:

Closing his article “Men and Machines” (February), Max Kozloff hints at the eventual obsolescence of art. Since this would be the result of human progress, I say, “Ever Onward.” As an artist, though, I am spontaneously hostile to the suggestion. In defense of both positions, I hope: (a) that art does acknowledge the possibility of impending extinction, and (b) that artists indicate this acknowledgment in their work. Thus, at least for the time being, creative endeavors will prove an adequate expression of consciousness.

As for the future, the human race perpetuates itself through humble awareness. If the species continues, artists can also learn to adapt and survive.

—Kathleen Snipes

Irvine, California

Sirs:

Annette Michelson’s lengthy article on the movie 2001 (February) was all well and good. However, an equally valid critical statement might be that the film was simply an

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW at the special holiday rate of $45 a year—70% off the newsstand price. You’ll receive the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.