PRINT October 1970

The Sculpture of Peter Alexander

How can anything ever be really and truly present to us, since its synthesis is never a completed process, and since I can always expect to see it break down and fall to the status of a mere illusion? Yet there is something and not nothing.

—M. Merleau-Ponty1

MY FIRST REACTIONS TO Peter Alexander’s sculpture were admittedly distrustful; because of the residue of Calvinism within me that demands that art works show some manual revision, I had doubts about elegant pieces of plastic which, toying with optics, seemed too much the automatic result of a simple chemical-physical process (casting polyester resin). I have changed my mind; Peter Alexander’s work of the last two years seems to me to contain a significant contribution to the purely visual properties of sculpture and, beyond that, a noticeable felt statement concerning the nature of the object in art.

There is a bit about Alexander,

to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. Please sign in below.

Not registered for Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW and save up to 65% off the newsstand price for full online access to this issue and our archive.

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.