TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bruce Nauman: Another Kind of Reasoning

I.

IN 1968 THE CUTTING EDGE of post-Minimalist sensibility could have been sectioned between Serra, Sonnier, and Nauman. And yet, each of Nauman’s successive appearances presents us with a growing insipidness, the one quality which, whatever else may have been wrong, he certainly was not thought to possess.

When Nauman worked with the verbal problems inherent in Duchamp’s oeuvre he was answering a central problem of contemporary art: where to stand in relation to Duchamp. Duchamp demonstrates, as no other artist does, that the ultimate basis of meaning in art is linguistic and not formal, whatever the formal properties his work may possess. In establishing his connection, Nauman settled on the baldest examination of the pun and arrogated a messianic mysticism—the banners and slogans—to himself as well. (The relationship to Duchamp in Nauman’s early work will be examined in Part II of this

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.