TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTERS

LETTERS

Sirs:

I’m not happy to be in the middle of a controversy between two critics who seem to take kindly to my work; but I can’t help commenting on Lawrence Alloway’s overkill of Diane Waldman’s essay in her recent book (Roy Lichtenstein by Diane Waldman, Harry N. Abrams).

From its awkward and inflammatory title on, the Alloway piece exceeds the boundaries of a book review; for example, to go as far as faulting Waldman for omitting Blam from my Guggenheim exhibition, 1969, when in fact Blam had been committed to another show and was unavailable.

But it is the unusual hostility toward Diane Waldman throughout his article which seems most objectionable and which makes it difficult to see his review as motivated solely by the search for esthetic truth.

Roy Lichtenstein

New York City

Lawrence Alloway replies:

About Blam: the owner of the painting told me, at the time of the Guggenheim show, that

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.