TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTERS

LETTERS

Sirs:

I should like to protest the new kind of “head-hunting” which some art historians have undertaken to detect so-called secondary images in Cézanne’s paintings. Of course, everybody is entitled to his own “discoveries.” While trying to see the self-portrait “discovered ” by Diane Lesko (“Cézanne’s ‘Bather’ and a Found Self-Portrait,” Artforum, Dec. 1976), I chanced upon a few discoveries of my own, among them a three-legged hangnail, a fur-collared flatiron, and a smiling pressure cooker. But I am withholding publication until I have more thoroughly investigated the new insights to be gained from these revelations.

What troubles me is that the various psychological conclusions drawn from such pictorial interpretations play havoc with documents and established facts. Ms. Lesko quotes Zola as saying of Cézanne in an early letter: “Paul may have the genius of a great painter: he will never

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the May 1977 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.