TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINT February 1988

Peter Schjeldahl

WE ARE TALKING WITH PETER SCHJELDAHL.

IS: How do you feel about the use of certain words such as “post,” “late,” “neo”?

PS: They block thinking. They assume all sorts of stuff. I don’t use jargon like that. Which isn’t to say I’m not attentive to the ideas; I try to translate them into English. And either there’s something there or there isn’t. If it doesn’t survive the translation there’s nothing there. “Postness” is definitely a feeling we have. “Post-Modern” makes so many assumptions about what “Modern” means. Mainly it seems to me to translate into, We don’t have to know what we’re talking about because it’s over. Which is a very Modern tenet. It seems like everything about all of the functions of the term “post-Modern” in terms of thinking are very Modern, very Modernist. It’s just the same old thing.

LS: Is it the same old thing, or the same wonderful thing?

PS: Oh, the same wonderful

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.