TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINT March 2002

LETTERS

LETTERS

IN THE DARK

To the Editor:

David Joselit’s review of “Into the Light: The Projected Image in American Art 1964-1977” [Focus, January 2002] is so off the mark in some of its statements regarding the purpose and content of the exhibition that, as its curator, I feel moved to respond. Joselit’s critique concerns the success or failure of what he claims to be the making of a “history of media art.” As both the exhibition wall texts and catalogue essays clearly state, “Into the Light” is precisely not a historical survey of “media art.” It has been curated in deliberate opposition to that anachronistic concept, making instead a specific curatorial argument regarding the projected image’s role in the process-based artmaking of ’60s and ’70s post-Minimalism, with particular reference to new definitions of physical and psychological space.

Joselit’s failure to address this central argument is

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW at the discounted rate of $45 a year—70% off the newsstand price—and receive the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the March 2002 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.