TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINT March 2003

’80s AGAIN

Lisa Yuskavage

The way I understand art history is that antagonisms are good. Whereas once there was neo-geo, neo-expressionism, or whatever else doing battle, the only thing antagonistic to painting now is everything outside it, if the curators who do Documenta or the Venice Biennale are any kind of gauge. Painting is in this ridiculous place: It’s dead, it’s alive, it’s dead, it’s alive. The problem is that the dialogue around painting is too flat, because there aren't enough recognized antagonisms; we’re bundled together against the so-called progressive genres.

As told to Tim Griffin

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the March 2003 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.