TABLE OF CONTENTS

MAY ’68

art and logic

I HAVE SOMETIMES WONDERED how an aesthetician like myself could have ended up on the front lines of Radical Feminism. On the one hand, it seems incongruous; on the other hand, radical politics—like aesthetics—is, at its best, a process of both critiquing a problem in its most fundamental form and trying to envision a better way for human beings to organize themselves in relation to one another.

To borrow a revolutionary move from the Abstract Expressionists, the first step is to break out of the frame. But in the case of Radical Feminism, this is more like extricating oneself from a set of nested Chinese boxes: one within another and another. When have you truly reached the last box, the last frame?

First, you must eliminate the institutions that have defined women: marriage, family, prostitution, and so forth. But what underlies and in fact generates these institutions—and

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW at the special holiday rate of $45 a year—70% off the newsstand price. You’ll receive the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the May 2008 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.