TABLE OF CONTENTS

interviews

1000 WORDS: MARIA LASSNIG

THE ART-HISTORICAL CATEGORY of “late work,” which emerged around the end of the eighteenth century, has itself begun to show signs of age. Strictly speaking, the kind of major, self-contained phase of artistic production defined by the term is carried out late in life by an exceptional figure who has freed him- or herself from all historical constraints and confronted the absolute head-on. Such a formulation was held to be true by intellectuals as recent as Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, who wrote at the beginning of their final book, What Is Philosophy? (1991): “There are times when old age produces not eternal youth but a sovereign freedom, a pure necessity in which one enjoys a moment of grace between life and death, and in which all the parts of the machine come together to send into the future a beam that cuts across all ages.” With the speed of artistic developments during the twentieth century and after, however, it has become increasingly difficult for artists to keep up with the changes in style demanded by the market. In turn, there is hardly anybody whose early work is not held up against his or her late work as a sign of the failure to develop over the decades and assert his or her relevance anew in changing contexts. And yet such ongoing pertinence is precisely what eighty-eight-year-old painter Maria Lassnig has sustained throughout her life—as is made clear once more in her most recent survey exhibition, currently at the Serpentine Gallery in London. The show, which remains on view through June 8, puts into service vibrant colors, multilayered emotional effects, and a striking intensity to condense more than a half century’s experience of painting and theory into roughly thirty canvases, most of them produced during the past three years.
 
Following her education at the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts between 1941 and 1944, Lassnig played a key role in the emergence of art informel in Austria, and in the early 1950s she exhibited in Vienna with abstract painters such as Arnulf Rainer and Josef Mikl. Around this time, Lassnig became interested in the linguistic games and theories of the Wiener Gruppe, a literary circle centered on Oswald Wiener, H. C. Artmann, Gerhard Rühm, and Friedrich Achleitner; and she met André Breton and Paul Celan on trips to Paris. She moved to the French capital in 1961, but by the decade’s end she was living in New York, where she remained until 1980, getting to know Dan Graham, Vito Acconci, and others. Matching her circuitous geographic path is an artistic one, and it now seems clear that Lassnig’s great historical achievement is to have marked out a passage for postwar painting from the self-referential art informel of the ’50s to the phenomenological, psychoanalytic, and feminist discourses of the ’60s and ’70s.
 
Indeed, in light of her oft-cited notion of “body-awareness painting,” one recalls that the theories of Merleau-Ponty and Lacan were put to the test in the context of painting long before they became important in discussions of Minimalist sculpture as well as photography and film theory. The preoccupation with sensations and emotions, and the associated idea of the artist as seismograph of his or her inner life, does not necessarily exhaust itself in empty formalism and apolitical remove from the world. On the contrary: “The body,” as Merleau-Ponty puts it, “is that strange object which uses its own parts as a general system of symbols for the world, and through which we can consequently ‘be at home in’ that world, ‘understand’ it and find significance in it.” In this sense, Lassnig’s painting might be described as an ambitious attempt to assert the self and in so doing to present what Merleau-Ponty calls “the whole system of experience”—a synthesizing and comprehensive perception of “world, own body and empirical self.” This insight also illuminates the sociopolitical aspects of Lassnig’s painting: She did not take part in the feminist movement of the ’70s and has always denied that her art has any gender- specific intention, but she is nevertheless unsparingly candid in her treatment of female identity—for example, in her pictures of an imaginary “happy family,” in which the pressure that comes from socially sanctioned role models is dramatically expressed.
 
Although Lassnig represented Austria (with Valie Export) at the Thirty-ninth Venice Biennale in 1980 and was included in Documenta 7 in 1982, international recognition has been slow in coming. Her project, with its analytic rigor and integrity, is clearly fundamentally removed from the much-hyped neo-expressionist painting of the early ’80s and its sweeping rhetorical gestures. But this is perhaps also why Lassnig’s pictures seem so fresh: Like the work of artists such as Joan Snyder, Amy Sillman, and Josh Smith, they open up the possibility of an art that is intimately involved with expressionistic and process-oriented painting but manages to avoid getting stuck in endgame scenarios, perpetual mourning, or cynical poses.
 
Achim Hochdörfer

MARIA LASSNIG

OVER THE YEARS, I have been involved with a lot of isms. They don’t simply disappear, of course, but are somehow still present even in my most recent pictures. I am, so to speak, eclectic within my own oeuvre, selecting things from the various isms that I mix into something new. I have been working long enough to establish my own tradition, from realism through Surrealism, art informel, automatism, and I don’t know how many other isms. I had to go through all of that—just imagine that I knew nothing about any of these movements when I studied at the Vienna Academy of Fine Art at the beginning of the 1940s. If you look at my early paintings, you will see how much it took at first, just in terms of color and form. So I don’t think it’s really fair for people nowadays to say that my later works are better than my earlier ones.

In the exhibition at the Serpentine Gallery, there

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW at the special holiday rate of $45 a year—70% off the newsstand price. You’ll receive the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.