TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINT March 2010

ANOTHER HISTORY: ON PHOTOGRAPHY AND ABSTRACTION

THERE IS NO ONE THING CALLED PHOTOGRAPHY. Photographs are images, but they are also things, and their meanings change with each material iteration: negative, digital file, exhibition print, magazine page, Web posting (not to mention the variations within each of these and other presentation forms). As Rosalind Krauss wrote in 1999—with pointed reference to Walter Benjamin’s essays on the discipline—we must acknowledge “the self-differential condition of mediums themselves” and “the necessary plurality of the arts . . . a plural condition that stands apart from any philosophically unified idea of Art.”¹ Nevertheless, the drive persists today to reestablish medium specificity, to find elements of aesthetic coherence that would draw disparate photographs together and unite them as Art, in a way distinct from other creative domains.

Defeated on the plane of the overtly figurative or documentary,

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and receive the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the March 2010 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.