TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTERS

TORTURED LOGIC

I wish to respond to Artforum’s coverage of Kathryn Bigelow’s recent work [“1000 Words,” introduction by Amy Taubin, January 2013].

Zero Dark Thirty represents torture as a path to truth. Its director questions whether these truths are worth it. She thereby sidesteps a more pressing question. Why does the movie suspend the audience’s sense of disbelief—by way of aggressively naturalistic directing and a rhetoric of “real events”—to establish a causal relationship between torture and fact? According to Bigelow’s chain of “real events,” bribery leads to deceit, but waterboarding leads to reality. There may be some dead ends here and there. But ultimately, it’s as clear-cut as a crossword puzzle.

Within the moral syntax of the contemporary mainstream, including even the famously bellophilic New York Times, Zero Dark Thirty stands out. Obama’s preference for assassinations over torture

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the March 2013 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.