TABLE OF CONTENTS

Letters

New Objectivity

Adrian Piper responds to the editors’ response to her letter in the Summer 2017 issue:

I APPRECIATE the editors’ impassioned defense of “the writer or viewer’s right—indeed, responsibility—to have independent thoughts,” of “the integrity of alternative interpretations,” and of “acknowledg[ing], more broadly, the reception of an artwork in the larger world” in response to my letter [“Matters of Fact,” Artforum, Summer 2017]. I think we can all agree that having independent thoughts is a good thing, as are alternative interpretations and a larger world beyond “the artist’s point of view” in which art is received.

However, the editors’ independent thoughts have, in this case, led them to another factual error. They state that I claim in my original letter to have “first used the Solzhenitsyn quotation at issue here in 2003,” etc. In fact I did not claim that. A review of my

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the PRINT EDITION of the December 2017 issue for $17 or the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.