New York

Ira Richer

Kornblee Gallery

Failed painting is as instructive as works the ambitiousness of which has prevailed, provided that the ambitiousness was present at the outset as is the case with a young painter, Ira Richer. I don’t like his work but his method is so lucid as to be an almost diagrammatic test case of the faltering appeal of classical field painting, of the kind codified in the years 1964–67.

Richer employs large horizontal canvases which he divides into four equal fields. Color is applied one to a rectangle and his downbeat color selection—beiges and blues—is perhaps the most admirable aspect of his work. He applies his color in wide, dry strokes forming a lozenge pattern around the quadrant structure. Much of the surface is left unbrushed, producing a puckered mylar optical effect such as we see tangibly in the recent Rosenquists. Through this opticality a dual problem is set up: the field is both

Sign-in to keep reading

Artforum print subscribers have full access to this article. If you are a subscriber, sign in below.

Not registered for artforum.com? Register here.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for only $50 a year—65% off the newsstand price—and get the print magazine plus full online access to this issue and our archive.*

Order the ONLINE EDITION for $5.99.

* This rate applies to U.S. domestic subscriptions.